• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Snitching

Criminal Informant Law, Policy, and Research

  • Home
  • About
  • Litigation
  • Legislation
  • Families & Youth
  • Blog
  • Resources & Scholarship

Archives for May 2017

Prosecutor in Willingham case tried for ethics violation, and acquitted

May 3, 2017 by Alexandra Natapoff

Originally posted May 3:  In a rare display of potential discipline, the prosecutor who misused a jailhouse informant against Cameron Todd Willingham–John Jackson–is on trial for ethics violations.  “Specifically, the state’s lawyers contend that Jackson made a deal with a jailhouse snitch who agreed to testify against Willingham and then hid that deal from Willingham’s defense attorneys — a clear violation of both law and ethics. They say that Jackson took extraordinary measures over the next two decades to conceal his deceitful actions.” Here is the story from The Intercept.

Update May 13: The jury acquitted prosecutor John Jackson.  From The Marshall Project: “By an 11-to-1 vote, a Navarro County jury rejected claims by the State Bar of Texas that Jackson made false statements, concealed evidence favorable to Willingham’s defense and obstructed justice.”

Filed Under: Jailhouse Informants, Prosecutors

Barry Scheck, Innocence Project Founder, on informant reform

May 3, 2017 by Alexandra Natapoff

Washington State is considering legislation that would strengthen the government’s obligation to disclose information about its criminal informants.   Barry Scheck, Founder of the Innocence Project, writes about how important this legislation is in Justice can be tainted by the use of informants’ testimony.

Filed Under: Jailhouse Informants, Legislation, Reliability

Copyright © 2026 Alexandra Natapoff · Log in · RSS on follow.it