« Huffington Post on jailhouse snitches and exonerations | Main | More fallout from the Jack Abramoff investigation »

October 12, 2009

Posted by Alexandra Natapoff at 09:59 AM

"Snitch and you're a dead man"

Journalism professor and author John Fountain weighs in on the "stop snitching" phenomenon in the Chicago Tribune. He describes urban neighborhoods permeated with fear and insecurity, and takes issue with criticism of residents who are unwilling to talk to police. He writes:

In my experience growing up in an impoverished Chicago community like those under siege, it boils down to an issue of trust. And many who live in the city's most murderous neighborhoods -- who have also witnessed police and political corruption and a trail of broken promises -- simply don't trust the authorities enough to come forward. By doing so, they could be laying their lives on the line. It isn't that people don't want to tell. They do. And it isn't that they aren't concerned about their neighborhoods. They are. But to come forward is to risk everything, even in a world where "safety" is always relative.

Fountain's piece highlights a central reason that the public debate over criminal justice is so fractured: people and groups have radically different experiences and expectations. In neighborhoods where police are perceived as responsive, where people do not worry constantly about their personal security, where the legal system seems fair and effective, it makes eminent sense to talk to police. In neighborhoods where none of this is true, it might make sense not to. Such differences in perception show up quite publicly in debates over "stop snitching," but they quietly affect all aspects of the criminal process, from the way people relate to defense lawyers to the kinds of punishment people consider to be fair. In my view, this is one of the reasons that the "stop snitching" debate is valuable: it encourages the public exposure of some very different legal realities.

Comments

Also, given the fact that cops who try to get testimony and assistance from people lie over and over again, its not surprising no one talks to them. I have dealt with police officers who wanted me to do a little bit of 'snitching' and they basically lied through their teeth the entire time. Everyone I know who has had a similar experience has been lied to. Maybe if cops wanted help on murder cases they would at least not lie to everyone they depend on for information in all other situations.

The so-called �Stop Snitching Campaign� is actually a manifesto. This manifesto originates from a deep seated sense of betrayal. It is a call for change from the most economically marginalized segment of America�s poor. The acceptance of poverty as a permanent condition is a violation of the law of self-preservation. We instinctively seek sustenance when poverty threatens our existence. The consequence of violating state or federal law does not preclude them from doing what they believe will relieve the suffering associated with absolute poverty and relative deprivation. They seek power and in their world money is the means to power. Misdeed is the prevalent means to money. When members of this segment of America�s poor turn to drug dealing to potentially relieve their suffering, they do not expect to be betrayed by the very people that should understand why they chose to violate the law in the first place.

Post a comment

NOTE: To comment anonymously, leave the Name and Email Address fields blank.




 

Legal and Government Resources

Sample Filings

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives